0BY4US
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
1,913holdings
0.32%annual fee
USmarket
Valuation1,148 companies covered
19.9×P / E82% by weight
2.01×P / B78% by weight
5.0%Earnings yield
ETF comparisons / 0BY4 vs VT
Fund comparison · 0BY4 · VT 2026-04-30
0BY4 vs VT
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF compared with VANGUARD TOTAL WORLD STOCK INDEX FUND
Most company exposure is different between these funds.0BY4 has 196 companies outside the overlap; VT has 8,460.
VTGlobal equity
VANGUARD TOTAL WORLD STOCK INDEX FUND
10,093holdings
0.06%annual fee
USmarket
Valuation7,366 companies covered
23.4×P / E90% by weight
2.85×P / B82% by weight
4.3%Earnings yield
Price development
Both lines rebased to 0% over their shared dates
Largest shared positions
1,321 companies held in both funds
0BY4 weight
VT weight
| Shared company | 0BY4 | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 2330 | 5.16% | 1.51% |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 005930 KS 2 share classes | 2.59% | 0.71% |
| ↳ Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 005930 KS | 2.33% | 0.63% |
| ↳ Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 005935 | 0.26% | 0.08% |
| ASML Holding N.V. ASML | 1.90% | 0.50% |
| SK hynix Inc 000660 | 2.11% | 0.43% |
| Tencent Holdings Limited 700 | 0.92% | 0.34% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC HSBA | 0.89% | 0.28% |
| Roche Holding AG ROP SW 2 share classes | 0.84% | 0.26% |
| ↳ Roche Holding AG ROP SW | 0.80% | 0.23% |
| ↳ Roche Holding AG RO | 0.04% | 0.04% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Limited 9988 | 0.55% | 0.26% |
| AstraZeneca PLC 2389879D | 0.80% | 0.25% |
| Novartis AG NOVN | 0.79% | 0.25% |
| Nestle SA NESN | 0.73% | 0.23% |
| Shell PLC SHEL | 0.59% | 0.23% |
| Royal Bank of Canada RY | 0.77% | 0.22% |
| Siemens AG SIE | 0.64% | 0.19% |
| Commonwealth Bank of Australia CBA | 0.51% | 0.19% |
| TOYOTA MOTOR CORP 7203 | 0.44% | 0.18% |
| MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP INC 8306 | 0.59% | 0.18% |
| BHP Group Ltd. BHP | 0.57% | 0.17% |
| Toronto-Dominion Bank/The TD | 0.53% | 0.16% |
| BANCO SANTANDER SAN 3 share classes | 0.55% | 0.16% |
| ↳ BANCO SANTANDER SAN | 0.55% | 0.00% |
| ↳ Banco Santander SA SAN | 0.00% | 0.16% |
| ↳ Banco Santander SA SAN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Allianz SE ALV | 0.49% | 0.15% |
| SAP SE SAP | 0.46% | 0.15% |
| Schneider Electric SE SU | 0.46% | 0.15% |
| TotalEnergies SE TTE | 0.40% | 0.15% |
| ABB Ltd ABBN | 0.45% | 0.14% |
0BY4 and VT questions
Based on the holdings compared above
How much do 0BY4 and VT overlap?
0BY4 and VT overlap by 29.7% by weight, across 1,321 shared companies.
Which companies do 0BY4 and VT both hold?
The largest companies held in both funds are Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., ASML Holding N.V., SK hynix Inc, Tencent Holdings Limited.
Can I hold both 0BY4 and VT?
Holding both means 29.7% of that part of your portfolio is the same companies counted twice. That can suit you or not depending on your goals; this tool reports the overlap rather than giving advice.
Is 0BY4 or VT cheaper?
0BY4 has a 0.32% expense ratio and VT has 0.06%.
How do 0BY4 and VT compare on valuation?
0BY4 has a weighted P/E of 19.9 and VT has a weighted P/E of 23.4.
Compare your own portfolio
Open the analyzerSee the companies and duplicated exposure across every fund you hold.